Posts tagged technology

Researchers rescue Moore’s Law

Will memristors save Moore’s Law? The answer appears to be yes … that is, if you redefine Moore’s Law, which has fueled the growth of the computer industry for four decades. Research groups say that memristors, a new type of memory device that’s on the verge of going commercial, will dramatically enhance the storage capacity and usability of computers.

» via MSNBC

Researchers rescue Moore’s Law

Will memristors save Moore’s Law? The answer appears to be yes … that is, if you redefine Moore’s Law, which has fueled the growth of the computer industry for four decades. Research groups say that memristors, a new type of memory device that’s on the verge of going commercial, will dramatically enhance the storage capacity and usability of computers.

» via MSNBC

Similarly, after 20 years of glorifying technology as if all computers were good and all use of it was good, science is beginning to embrace the idea that some technology is Twinkies and some technology is Brussels sprouts.
— Matt Richtel (via NPR) (via roomthily)
soupsoup:


daverosado:

Found this on ye olde Gizmodo. A pretty cool graphic demonstrating just how stupidly spoiled we are by technology now. Bonus: the left side of that graphic can more or less apply to most of the 90s.

Everything here is accurate except nobody watches Leno.

soupsoup:

daverosado:

Found this on ye olde Gizmodo. A pretty cool graphic demonstrating just how stupidly spoiled we are by technology now. Bonus: the left side of that graphic can more or less apply to most of the 90s.

Everything here is accurate except nobody watches Leno.

I have been assigned as a staff officer to a headquarters in Afghanistan for about two months. During that time, I have not done anything productive. Fortunately little of substance is really done here, but that is a task we do well… For headquarters staff, war consists largely of the endless tinkering with PowerPoint slides to conform with the idiosyncrasies of cognitively challenged generals in order to spoon-feed them information. Even one tiny flaw in a slide can halt a general’s thought processes as abruptly as a computer system’s blue screen of death.
— U.S. Army Reserve colonel Lawrence Sellin, formerly a staff officer in Allied headquarters in Afghanistan. He was fired for his comments this week. (hat tip: Kevin Drum) (via officialssay)

So we need more education to respond to a world with more technology. Smarter phones and smarter grids require smarter workers. It’s a parallelism, it must be true!

But what if it’s not true? What if the largest, fastest growing job sector of the next decade have more to do with demographic changes than technological advancements? And what if those jobs don’t require more time in higher education?

From The Atlantic.

Seriously, I agree with this article 100%. You don’t necessarily need more education. You just need better education. The most valuable education is the type that has, well, value. I agree there’s a historico-teleological desire for being a fully-formed human being. I just don’t know if pledging Kappa, carrying a 3.3, and graduating with a communications degree (for $120,000 in debt) is helping anyone, anywhere.

(via collegefail)

Why Privacy Is Not Dead

Each time Facebook’s privacy settings change or a technology makes personal information available to new audiences, people scream foul. Each time, their cries seem to fall on deaf ears.

The reason for this disconnect is that in a computational world, privacy is often implemented through access control. Yet privacy is not simply about controlling access. It’s about understanding a social context, having a sense of how our information is passed around by others, and sharing accordingly. As social media mature, we must rethink how we encode privacy into our systems.

Privacy is not in opposition to speaking in public. We speak privately in public all the time. Sitting in a restaurant, we have intimate conversations knowing that the waitress may overhear. We count on what Erving Goffman called “civil inattention”: people will politely ignore us, and even if they listen they won’t join in, because doing so violates social norms. Of course, if a close friend sits at the neighboring table, everything changes. Whether an environment is public or not is beside the point. It’s the situation that matters.

» via Technology Review

Your Brain on Computers - Use of Digital Devices Cuts Into Brain's Downtime

Cellphones, which in the last few years have become full-fledged computers with high-speed Internet connections, let people relieve the tedium of exercising, the grocery store line, stoplights or lulls in the dinner conversation.

The technology makes the tiniest windows of time entertaining, and potentially productive. But scientists point to an unanticipated side effect: when people keep their brains busy with digital input, they are forfeiting downtime that could allow them to better learn and remember information, or come up with new ideas.

» via The New York Times

Are iPads and Kindles better for the environment than books?

Let’s talk numbers. According to the environmental consulting firm Cleantech, which aggregated a series of studies, a single book generates about 7.5 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents—the value of all its greenhouse gas emissions expressed in terms of the impact of carbon dioxide. That includes production, transport, and either recycling or disposal. (Attention students: Your textbooks are particularly bad, releasing more than double the CO2 equivalents of the average book.)

Apple’s iPad generates 130 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents during its lifetime, according to company estimates. Amazon has not released numbers for the Kindle, but independent analysts put it at 168 kg. Those analyses do not indicate how much additional carbon is generated per book read (as a result of the energy required to host the e-bookstore’s servers and power the screen while you read), but they do include the full cost of manufacture, which likely accounts for the lion’s share of emissions. (The iPad uses just three watts of electricity while you’re reading, far less than most light bulbs.) If we can trust those numbers, then, the iPad pays for its CO2 emissions about one third-of the way through your 18th book. You’d need to get halfway into your 23rd book on Kindle to get out of the environmental red.

So far, electronic readers—not the machines, in this case, but their owners—are far surpassing that pace. Forrester Research estimates that the average user purchases three books per month. At that rate, you could earn back your iPad’s carbon dioxide in just six months.

» via Slate

Forrester: iPad kicks off 'tablet mania'

In its research, Forrester notes the rapid consumer awareness of the iPad. The company said that in online surveys in May and June, awareness for the iPad has gone way up. In May, 83 percent of the more than 4,000 respondents said they’ve heard of the iPad. In June, that number jumped to 95 percent awareness.

As a point of comparison, in the same survey 25 percent of consumers said they have never heard of the Amazon Kindle. The Kindle has been on the market for three years.

» via CNET news

Forget Hall Monitors, School Investigates Tracking Students with RFID

So much for bathroom passes and hall monitors - these days it’s technology that is making the art of skipping class much more difficult for students, and we’re not just talking about security cameras. A forward-thinking school district in Connecticut is looking to crack down on wayward students, faculty and even equipment by making use of radio frequency identification (RFID) in its schools.

New Canaan Public Schools hopes to increase the efficiency of its security efforts by embedding RFID tags into student and faculty identification cards and onto various pieces of school equipment. The tags could be used to track where specific students and faculty are located throughout campus, as well as hunt down missing laptops, projectors and other school property.

» via ReadWriteWeb

Computers that read minds are being developed by Intel

Unlike current brain-controlled computers, which require users to imagine making physical movements to control a cursor on a screen, the new technology will be capable of directly interpreting words as they are thought.

Intel’s scientists are creating detailed maps of the activity in the brain for individual words which can then be matched against the brain activity of someone using the computer, allowing the machine to determine the word they are thinking.

Preliminary tests of the system have shown that the computer can work out words by looking at similar brain patterns and looking for key differences that suggest what the word might be.

» via The Telegraph

Alt Text: Brilliant Plans to Rescue Dying Industries


The Recording Industry Association of America, that adorable cave man of a gigantic litigious organization, recently announced that it wants electronic devices like cellphones and music players to be legally required to incorporate FM radio receivers, both to protect broadcasters’ revenue streams and to ease the transition of anyone caught up in a time tunnel from the 1960s and brought to our era.
I think this is wonderful news, because I am a humor columnist. This is such a wonderfully goofy idea that I just want to hug the RIAA and ruffle its hair.


» via Wired

Alt Text: Brilliant Plans to Rescue Dying Industries

The Recording Industry Association of America, that adorable cave man of a gigantic litigious organization, recently announced that it wants electronic devices like cellphones and music players to be legally required to incorporate FM radio receivers, both to protect broadcasters’ revenue streams and to ease the transition of anyone caught up in a time tunnel from the 1960s and brought to our era.

I think this is wonderful news, because I am a humor columnist. This is such a wonderfully goofy idea that I just want to hug the RIAA and ruffle its hair.

» via Wired

We have too many cellphones. We’ve got too many Internets. We have got to get rid of those machines. We have too many machines now.

College 2.0: Teachers Without Technology Strike Back

Mark James, a visiting lecturer at the University of West Florida, declared his summer course in English literature technology-free—he skipped the PowerPoint slides and YouTube videos he usually shows, and he asked students to silence their cellphones and close their laptops.

Banishing the gear improved the course, he argues. “The students seemed more involved in the discussion than when I allowed them to go online,” he told me as the summer term wound down. “They were more attentive, and we were able to go into a little more depth.”

Mr. James is not antitechnology—he said he had some success in his composition courses using an online system that’s sold with textbooks. But he is frustrated by professors and administrators who believe that injecting the latest technology into the classroom naturally improves teaching.

» via The Chronicle of Higher Education (Subscription may be required for some content)

Probabilistic Chip Promises Better Flash Memory, Spam Filtering


A new chip could improve error correction in flash memory, and might also lead to more efficient spam filtering and shopping recommendations.
Lyric Semiconductor, a small MIT spinoff, has created an error correction chip that uses a technique called “probability processing” to guess the right answer or solve a problem.
The chip, called LEC, is 30 times smaller in size than current digital error correction technology. That means manufacturers can create higher density chips that offer more storage at lower costs.


» via Wired

Probabilistic Chip Promises Better Flash Memory, Spam Filtering

A new chip could improve error correction in flash memory, and might also lead to more efficient spam filtering and shopping recommendations.

Lyric Semiconductor, a small MIT spinoff, has created an error correction chip that uses a technique called “probability processing” to guess the right answer or solve a problem.

The chip, called LEC, is 30 times smaller in size than current digital error correction technology. That means manufacturers can create higher density chips that offer more storage at lower costs.

» via Wired