Posts tagged teaching

More Professors Could Share Lectures Online. But Should They?

“Camera shy” is not the first phrase that comes to my mind for Siva Vaidhyanathan. The University of Virginia faculty member commands healthy fees for his lively presentations on media studies and law at conferences, and he has even appeared on The Daily Show With Jon Stewart. But he’s not sure if he should record his lectures—or if he does, whether he should share them freely online.

An associate professor who focuses on digital media, Mr. Vaidhyanathan regularly teaches and writes enthusiastically about movements to make music, movies, and other creative works free online. I thought he’d be one of the first people to advocate open access to lectures.

But no. “I find myself playing devil’s advocate all the time” in class, he said. “I don’t want to be on the record saying something I don’t even believe” if the lectures go out on the Web. He considers the classroom a “sacred space” that may need to stay private to preserve academic freedom.

» via The Chronicle of Higher Education (Subscription may be required for some content)

Why Teachers Can't Control Their Classrooms

Now when you talk to new teachers—which I do regularly as an education reporter—their biggest complaint is that no one teaches them how to control a classroom. For the small fortune they spend to get a teaching degree, they get plenty of pedagogy (“Reflections on Learning” is a typical course name), which they generally don’t use. But their professors never seem to get around to teaching “Keeping Kids Under Control 101.” Student-teaching stints are typically done in “middle-class districts that are well ordered,” says Aaron M. Pallas, professor of sociology and education at Teachers College at Columbia University, and few colleges offer practical training for those planning to work in tougher settings.

The solution is probably not to encourage teachers to bean kids with erasers. But something is needed. Jennifer Scoggins, 32, a New York teacher currently working on her Ph.D., said she had no chance to succeed when she began her first teaching job in 2001. She was asked to take over a second-grade class in Harlem midyear—after several other teachers had given up. The kids were out of control when she arrived, and things never improved. “Chairs were being thrown, kids were stabbing each other with pencils,” she said. “I felt absolutely like a total failure. The only thing I was proud of was that I never cried in front of the kids. But I cried everywhere else: in supply closets, on the subway, at home.” Even though Scoggins had earned a master’s in education, she said, “very practical things were never taught.”

» via Newsweek

Building a Better Teacher


  The testing mandates in No Child Left Behind had generated a sea of data, and researchers were now able to parse student achievement in ways they never had before. A new generation of economists devised statistical methods to measure the “value added” to a student’s performance by almost every factor imaginable: class size versus per-pupil funding versus curriculum. When researchers ran the numbers in dozens of different studies, every factor under a school’s control produced just a tiny impact, except for one: which teacher the student had been assigned to. Some teachers could regularly lift their students’ test scores above the average for children of the same race, class and ability level. Others’ students left with below-average results year after year. William Sanders, a statistician studying Tennessee teachers with a colleague, found that a student with a weak teacher for three straight years would score, on average, 50 percentile points behind a similar student with a strong teacher for those years. Teachers working in the same building, teaching the same grade, produced very different outcomes. And the gaps were huge. Eric Hanushek, a Stanford economist, found that while the top 5 percent of teachers were able to impart a year and a half’s worth of learning to students in one school year, as judged by standardized tests, the weakest 5 percent advanced their students only half a year of material each year.


» via The New York Times

Building a Better Teacher

The testing mandates in No Child Left Behind had generated a sea of data, and researchers were now able to parse student achievement in ways they never had before. A new generation of economists devised statistical methods to measure the “value added” to a student’s performance by almost every factor imaginable: class size versus per-pupil funding versus curriculum. When researchers ran the numbers in dozens of different studies, every factor under a school’s control produced just a tiny impact, except for one: which teacher the student had been assigned to. Some teachers could regularly lift their students’ test scores above the average for children of the same race, class and ability level. Others’ students left with below-average results year after year. William Sanders, a statistician studying Tennessee teachers with a colleague, found that a student with a weak teacher for three straight years would score, on average, 50 percentile points behind a similar student with a strong teacher for those years. Teachers working in the same building, teaching the same grade, produced very different outcomes. And the gaps were huge. Eric Hanushek, a Stanford economist, found that while the top 5 percent of teachers were able to impart a year and a half’s worth of learning to students in one school year, as judged by standardized tests, the weakest 5 percent advanced their students only half a year of material each year.

» via The New York Times

How Twitter in the Classroom is Boosting Student Engagement

Professors who wish to engage students during large lectures face an uphill battle. Not only is it a logistical impossibility for 200+ students to actively participate in a 90 minute lecture, but the downward sloping cone-shape of a lecture hall induces a one-to-many conversation. This problem is compounded by the recent budget cuts that have squeezed ever more students into each room.

Fortunately, educators (including myself) have found that Twitter is an effective way to broaden participation in lecture. Additionally, the ubiquity of laptops and smartphones have made the integration of Twitter a virtually bureaucracy-free endeavor. This post describes the two main benefits professors find when using Twitter in lecture.

» via Mashable

> Most web developers gnash their teeth at the thought of having to support their applications under Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 6 browser. IE6 isn’t standards-compliant, it’s insecure, and it does not play well with anything else on the web — especially the software you long to deploy. But a minority of companies still use IE6, to developers’ consternation. > I began to wonder: Why? I found myself curious about the reasons a company might hang onto the old browser despite all its bad press. It would be easy to cop an attitude (and most developers whom I asked about this issue had a violent emotional response). But my motivation was not meant to evaluate anybody’s reasons, only to learn them. This is not because I am a kind and understanding person who is above petty whinging like, “What the heck is wrong with those people?!” but in an effort to listen to the user before designing software for them. You can’t solve people-problems unless you understand the users’ reasons. You can’t sell someone on your strategy unless you know what holds them back. (I simply whine later, to myself.) > Granted, in some businesses it would seem like there isn’t a big rush to change, as Microsoft has said that “Both IE6 and IE7 will continue to be supported with Windows XP. They will continue to be supported until the end of support for Windows XP on April 8, 2014.” Yet, vendors are (finally, some would mutter) dropping support for IE6, and that trend can only continue. So I asked for input from people who work in companies that are still standardized on Internet Explorer 6 why they do so — with some results that surprised me.
But we have never identified excellent teachers in any reliable, objective way. Instead, we tend to ascribe their gifts to some mystical quality that we can recognize and revere—but not replicate. The great teacher serves as a hero but never, ironically, as a lesson.
The task of the modern educator is not to cut down jungles, but to irrigate deserts.
— C.S. Lewis (via quote-book)

How Teachers & Classrooms Will Need to Change in Our Hyperconnected Age

chrbutler:

From The Futurist:

How will digital technologies and hyperconnectivity affect learning and the classroom of the future?   We at THE FUTURIST magazine, for our January-February issue, addressed this issue with communications scholar Janna Anderson, an associate professor in Elon University’s School of Communications and the lead author of the “Future of the Internet” book series published by Cambria Press.
Until now, Teach for America has kept its investigation largely to itself. But for this story, the organization allowed me access to 20 years of experimentation, studded by trial and error. The results are specific and surprising. Things that you might think would help a new teacher achieve success in a poor school—like prior experience working in a low-income neighborhood—don’t seem to matter. Other things that may sound trifling—like a teacher’s extracurricular accomplishments in college—tend to predict greatness.

Whiteboarding "Uneven" Learning

In far too many schools, we still “de-skill” students, unplugging them from the mediums they are most comfortable with to teach through methods contemporary to the buggy whip. We unplug our students, believing that laptops, iPods, cellphones, and even whiteboards have no real place in teaching the three Rs. As a result, students fail to see the relevance of their education as they judge the delivery and not the content. In our quest to boost high school graduation numbers and build a more educated workforce, we should be doing everything and anything we can to better connect students to those learning and opportunity pathways. That not only means technology, but it means well-integrated tech.

» via Eduflack » via Mind Dump

Good teaching is one-fourth preparation and three-fourths theater.
— Gail Godwin

What Makes a Great Teacher?

givemesomethingtoread:

For years, the secrets to great teaching have seemed more like alchemy than science, a mix of motivational mumbo jumbo and misty-eyed tales of inspiration and dedication. But for more than a decade, one organization has been tracking hundreds of thousands of kids, and looking at why some teachers can move them three grade levels ahead in a year and others can’t. Now, as the Obama administration offers states more than $4 billion to identify and cultivate effective teachers, Teach for America is ready to release its data.

Colleges Lagging in Technology and Teaching Quality, Top Education Official Says

“Getting technology tools into the hands of every student and family should be standard practice. It isn’t now,” said the under secretary of the Education Department, Martha J. Kanter, addressing a mix of technologists and educators at the HigherEd Tech Summit here, part of the giant salute to gadgetry known as the Consumer Electronics Show. Nor are best practices for professors to use technology to improve learning standard, Ms. Kanter said: “We have a lot of work to do to make faculty comfortable with technology and ways to use it. We are losing ground.”

But the under secretary was less specific about how the Obama Administration was going to help this happen. Ms. Kanter, who pushed technology programs when she held leadership positions at California community colleges, did mention the education department had $350-million dollars for a grants program in best practices innovation, but did not offer details about how and when such grants would be offered. Some technology executives in the audience noted that private industry was doing a better job identifying and distributing “best practice” modules than the government.

» via The Chronicle of Higher Education (Subscription may be required for some content)