Posts tagged digital

The Digital Renting Business is Fundamentally Flawed

In a digital marketplace, the cost of manufacturing is zero. Once you have created your “prototype,” you also have your product. A movie studio doesn’t need to manufacture DVDs, because the original digital file can be used directly.

There is a very low cost of distribution, which amounts $0.43 USD/person if you decide to use Amazon S3 (cloud computing). And this amount includes storage costs as well. But that costs would still be $0.43 if the TV and movie studios where to sell a movie instead of renting it.

However, the technical requirements for renting content are enormous. You have to add some kind of DRM to prevent content to be played 48 hours later. It has to work even when you are not connected. You have to create databases that tracks each transaction etc. All which costs money to make?

So what exactly is the renting business model solving?

» via Baekdal.com

And it’s outrageous that that you can’t sell or even give away an e-book when you’re finished with it. You paid for it; why shouldn’t you be allowed to pass it on? (End of rant.)

New Kindle Leaves Rivals Farther Behind

Digital first sale is going to start hitting home for people with ebooks.

(via publicknowledge)

Rice U. to Close Its Digital Press Next Month

Rice University will close its press in September, the university confirmed today. The move ends a high-profile experiment in digital university-press publishing. Closed once before, in 1996, the press was reborn in 2006 as an all-digital operation. But it had proven too expensive to sustain even in its new form, according to a statement by Eugene Levy, a Rice professor of astrophysics who stepped down as the university’s provost in June. As provost, Levy authorized the money for the press’s rebirth four years ago.

“The hope was that, without the burden of having to maintain a print inventory, the press might sustain itself largely on revenues from print-on-demand book sales,” Levy’s statement said. “Unfortunately, book sales remained very slow, and projections discouraged the anticipation that revenues would, in the foreseeable future, grow to a level that could materially cover even minimal costs of operations. Combined with pressures on the university budget from the broad fiscal crisis of recent years, the university concluded that it could not continue indefinite subsidy of the RUP experiment, as painful budget reductions were being absorbed across the entire university, including in the core of Rice’s educational and research mission.”

» via The Chronicle of Higher Education (Subscription may be required for some content)

Library opens new chapter

“The times are changing,” said President Dan Kinney. “Colleges must adapt.”

With the fall semester ready to start, Iowa Western students will use the resources found in the cyberlibrary in the new student center.

“There are no books,” Kinney said. “Everything will be on databases online. We are not going to buy any more books.”

The existing books are being distributed to their respective academic departments.

» via Omaha.com » via TeleRead

What happens when we step away from our devices and rest our brains?
This Will Kill That


“Ceci tuera cela”: the famous slogan of Claude Frollo, the archdeacon of Notre-Dame in Victor Hugo’s Notre-Dame de Paris, as he touches a printed book and glances nostalgically at the cathedral towers.  “This will kill that.”  It’s not hard to sympathize these days.  Hugo had to reimagine the 15th century in order to evoke a major shift in technologies of the word.  We just have to hold our smart phones while looking at a copy of Hugo’s novel—or read Hugo’s novel on our smart phones.  Resistance is futile: welcome to our new digital overlords!

But Hugo’s resigned pessimism as well as his technological determinism, are, I think, unwarranted now, for reasons both abstract and pragmatic.  The abstract reason is that technological changes to literacy have slow and unpredictable effects.  Right now many digital formats are still straightforward recreations of the book; the Kindle and its cousins reproduce a mise en page that hasn’t changed in fundamentals since 13th century scribes at the new universities of Western Europe offered harried students books with running heads, chapter titles, indices, and the like.  What remains to be seen is if, and how, digital technology changes that format at all.


» via n+1

This Will Kill That

“Ceci tuera cela”: the famous slogan of Claude Frollo, the archdeacon of Notre-Dame in Victor Hugo’s Notre-Dame de Paris, as he touches a printed book and glances nostalgically at the cathedral towers.  “This will kill that.”  It’s not hard to sympathize these days.  Hugo had to reimagine the 15th century in order to evoke a major shift in technologies of the word.  We just have to hold our smart phones while looking at a copy of Hugo’s novel—or read Hugo’s novel on our smart phones.  Resistance is futile: welcome to our new digital overlords!

But Hugo’s resigned pessimism as well as his technological determinism, are, I think, unwarranted now, for reasons both abstract and pragmatic.  The abstract reason is that technological changes to literacy have slow and unpredictable effects.  Right now many digital formats are still straightforward recreations of the book; the Kindle and its cousins reproduce a mise en page that hasn’t changed in fundamentals since 13th century scribes at the new universities of Western Europe offered harried students books with running heads, chapter titles, indices, and the like.  What remains to be seen is if, and how, digital technology changes that format at all.

» via n+1

Content owners claim they are doomed, because in the digital environment, they can’t compete with free. But they’ve made such claims before. This short essay traces the history of content owner claims that new technologies will destroy their business over the last two centuries. None have come to pass. It is likely the sky isn’t falling this time either. I suggest some ways content may continue to thrive in the digital environment.
Is the Sky Falling on the Content Industries? by Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School (via publicknowledge)
booyahgrandma:


Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age

Perhaps more significant, the number who believed that copying from the Web constitutes “serious cheating” is declining — to 29 percent on average in recent surveys from 34 percent earlier in the decade.

booyahgrandma:

Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age

Perhaps more significant, the number who believed that copying from the Web constitutes “serious cheating” is declining — to 29 percent on average in recent surveys from 34 percent earlier in the decade.

But it is not book reading. Or newspaper reading. It is screen reading. Screens are always on, and, unlike with books we never stop staring at them. This new platform is very visual, and it is gradually merging words with moving images: words zip around, they float over images, serving as footnotes or annotations, linking to other words or images. You might think of this new medium as books we watch, or tele­vision we read. Screens are also intensely data-driven. Pixels encourage numeracy and produce rivers of numbers flowing into databases. 1 Visualizing data is a new art, and reading charts a new literacy. Screen culture demands fluency in all kinds of symbols, not just letters.

On vacation, tech-loving kids -- and parents -- find it hard to unplug

Two hours into another day of his family’s beach vacation, Brandon Hubacher had sent 50 text messages to his friends in Fairfax County.

“Chillen on the beach,” the 16-year-old messaged a buddy at 12:04 p.m., the ocean surf beckoning mere yards away.

“Luckyy” the friend zipped back.

Unplugging could not have been further from the teenager’s mind. “I wouldn’t think about it,” he said as he eyed the ocean, a Redskins cap turned backward on his head. Only for a swim would he and his cellphone part ways, he said.

Thus is digital technology making an indelible mark on the long tradition of the American family vacation.

» via The Washington Post

Are we teaching Networked Literacy


The pyramid represents the amount of time we spend teaching different types of literacy. Print Literacy is still the bases of our teaching in schools. Some of us and some schools are starting to bring digital literacy into the equation, but few of us are touching on or teaching Networked Literacy. In August as I started to think about this idea of Networked Literacy I came up with this working definition:

Networked literacy is what the web is about. It’s about understanding how people and communication networks work. It’s the understanding of how to find information and how to be found. It’s about how to read hyperlinked text articles, and understand the connections that are made when you become “friends” or “follow” someone on a network. It’s the understanding of how to stay safe and how to use the networked knowledge that is the World Wide Web. Networked Literacy is about understanding connections.


» via The Thinking Stick

Are we teaching Networked Literacy

The pyramid represents the amount of time we spend teaching different types of literacy. Print Literacy is still the bases of our teaching in schools. Some of us and some schools are starting to bring digital literacy into the equation, but few of us are touching on or teaching Networked Literacy. In August as I started to think about this idea of Networked Literacy I came up with this working definition:

Networked literacy is what the web is about. It’s about understanding how people and communication networks work. It’s the understanding of how to find information and how to be found. It’s about how to read hyperlinked text articles, and understand the connections that are made when you become “friends” or “follow” someone on a network. It’s the understanding of how to stay safe and how to use the networked knowledge that is the World Wide Web. Networked Literacy is about understanding connections.

» via The Thinking Stick

Digital Repositories Foment a Quiet Revolution in Scholarship

At the age of 92, Robert Katz is enjoying an unexpected scholarly renaissance. The emeritus professor of physics retired from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln 22 years ago. Lately, thanks to the university’s institutional repository, called the UNL Digital Commons after the software that runs it, people all over the world have been finding and downloading papers Mr. Katz wrote years or decades ago. His work on the biological effects of radiation has found a new and far-flung audience, making him the most-downloaded Nebraska at Lincoln faculty author represented in Digital Commons.

There’s been a lot of hoopla about institutional repositories in the last few years, as Harvard and other universities have adopted open-access policies and set up IR’s into which faculty members could deposit their work. That includes not just journal articles but so-called gray literature: working papers, data sets, lectures, and other material that publishers usually don’t touch.

The heady rhetoric of the early days—that the repository model would help spread the gospel of open access and end publishers’ stranglehold on scholarly output—has not quite panned out. After a period of uncertainty and angst, repository managers have been turning to a quieter, more practical emphasis on serving scholars, making their work accessible, and preserving it for the long term.

» via The Chronicle of Higher Education (Subscription may be required for some content)

The emergence of a new media system is typified by a period of transposition, where the behavioural grammar of the previous system remains dominant. The first television shows were radio shows with people talking directly into camera. The first films were stageplays that had been filmed. And the first marketing forays online took what we knew about media and branding from broadcast media and applied it to a whole new space.

But digital is different. Digital is not a channel. It’s a suite of platforms, channels and tactics that will, ultimately subsume its parents entirely. Digital marketing is not simply a new place to disperse persuasive symbols, but the emergence of any entirely new behavioural grammar, as companies and their customer begin to engage with each other in entirely new ways in entirely new spaces, where everyone has an equal voice.

— From this MUST READ post by Faris, ”A decade of digital: 10 things for 2010” (via alexjcampbell)

Digital Revolution Shakes Foundations of Book Retailing

But the digital revolution sweeping the media world is rewriting the rules of the book industry, upending the established players which have dominated for decades. Electronic books are still in their infancy, comprising an estimated 3% to 5% of the market today. But they are fast accelerating the decline of physical books, forcing retailers, publishers, authors and agents to reinvent their business models or be painfully crippled.

“By the end of 2012, digital books will be 20% to 25% of unit sales, and that’s on the conservative side,” predicts Mike Shatzkin, chief executive of the Idea Logical Co., publishing consultants. “Add in another 25% of units sold online, and roughly half of all unit sales will be on the Internet.”

» via The Wall Street Journal (subscription may be required)

Digital Media Consumption Increases - But Few Are Willing to Pay

In the UK, consumers are spending more time with digital and traditional media. According to the second KPMG Media and Entertainment Barometer, the average monthly consumption of traditional media climbed from 11 hours and 40 minutes per month in September 2009 to 12 hours and 13 minutes in March 2010. For digital media, the increase was more dramatic. Consumption of digital media rose from 6 hours 14 minutes to 7 hours 28 minutes per month. At the same time, however, consumers now spend less on digital and traditional media. Even though more newspapers are putting their content behind pay walls, the number of consumers who paid nothing for accessing online news actually increased over the last few months.

» via ReadWriteWeb

Digital Media Consumption Increases - But Few Are Willing to Pay

In the UK, consumers are spending more time with digital and traditional media. According to the second KPMG Media and Entertainment Barometer, the average monthly consumption of traditional media climbed from 11 hours and 40 minutes per month in September 2009 to 12 hours and 13 minutes in March 2010. For digital media, the increase was more dramatic. Consumption of digital media rose from 6 hours 14 minutes to 7 hours 28 minutes per month. At the same time, however, consumers now spend less on digital and traditional media. Even though more newspapers are putting their content behind pay walls, the number of consumers who paid nothing for accessing online news actually increased over the last few months.

» via ReadWriteWeb