“[Roberts’] knowledge of the posts only becomes relevant if the court finds the activity of liking a Facebook page to be constitutionally protected. It is the court’s conclusion that merely “liking” a Facebook page is insufficient speech to merit constitutional protection. In cases where courts have found that constitutional speech protections extended to Facebook posts, actual statements existed within the record.”

Facebook “likes” aren’t speech protected by the First Amendment, rules judge

Notes

  1. stumblrfumblr reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  2. infoneer-pulse posted this